dougwestendorp.com
Doug Westendorp
Contemplative Art
  • Home
    • Resume and contact information
    • Gallery of Student Work >
      • The Blue/Orange Project
      • Student Work (2) Yellow/Violet
      • Student Work (3) Final Project
  • Art Statement, 2023
    • Art Statement 2021-2022
    • Artist Statement, 2018-2020
    • Artist Statement, 2011-2017
  • New Work, 2023
  • Blogs
    • Thoughts on Contemplative Art
    • Poetry Journal
  • Drawings, 2020 - 22
    • Biomorphic C, 2022
    • Biomorphic B, 2022
    • Pencil 7.5 x 7.5
    • Pencil 2020 22
  • Square Mandalas
    • Ten Inch Squares
    • The Overspray Series
  • The Remnant Series
    • New Remnants
    • Early Remnants
  • Gallery of Past Work
    • Oil Pastel and Oil Stick
    • Geometric Designs >
      • The "Scythe" series
      • The "Whisper" Series
      • Lattice Windows
      • "Ghost" Geometry
      • Panel Paintings
    • Graph Paper Drawings >
      • Pencil, 2014
      • Pencil, 2015
      • Pencil, March 2016
      • Pencil, June 2016
      • Pencil, October 2016
      • Pencil, 2018 and 2019
    • Stone Poems
    • Disappearing Journal Series
    • Oil Stick on Paper
    • Early Still Life Work
    • Dreamscapes
    • Themed Sketchbooks >
      • Monoliths, 2022
      • Biomorphic A 2022
      • Feathers, 2019
      • Geometry, 2019
      • Geometry, 2015
      • The Crucifix Book, 2012
    • Installation Views
  • Self Published Books
    • Short Stories
    • Poetry Books
    • Existential Coloring Books
    • Portfolio Books
    • Book Design
    • Illustrations >
      • Turf-domed Hermitage Community
      • The Hermitage
      • The Sphere of Life

THE CONTEMPLATIVE THREAT

11/6/2012

0 Comments

 
When I put the quote from Beverly Lanzetta at the top of my website, “Contemplation is always a revolutionary act,” I was not thinking about politics. I was thinking of our visual culture. We live in a time and place where contemplation goes against the mainstream visual landscape. Our postmodern art scene tends towards the narcissistic, neurotic, derisive and offensive. Every trip to the art museum seems to offer new ways to offend, disgust and bully the visually sensitive and the contemplative spirit. This is what was in my mind at the time.

But it wasn’t the visual elite of the art world who had the Chris Drury piece on the campus of the University of Wyoming destroyed. [Please see my last two entries.] It was the politically elite, the reigning oligarchy, the moneyed interests, those with the wealth and power to destroy what they will.

In a recent essay, Chris Hedges talked about this ruling class. He said, “The elite deeply fears any art, literature, philosophy, poetry, theology and drama that challenge the assumptions and structures of authority.” The destruction of “Carbon Sink,” seems to bear this out. What else might have been the impetus to remove and destroy a work of art but fear? Fear that it would encourage contemplation of our situation, our relationship with nature, or our relationship with the corporations who provide us with energy. Any considered opinions on these topics are not welcome. Hedges goes on to say that, “The role of education, the elites believe, is to train us vocationally for our allotted positions and assure proper deference to the wealthy. Disciplines that prod us to think are—and the sneering elites are not wrong about this—‘political,’ ‘leftist,’ ‘liberal’ or ‘subversive.’ And schools and universities across the country are effectively stomping out these disciplines.” 

Stomping, in this case, almost literally. 

You may find the full essay at Common Dreams:

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/11/05-2

I don’t think of my own artwork as political, any more than Drury appears to, but I am not unaware of the political ramifications of the contemplative engagement in these times. 

0 Comments

MORE ON THE DESTRUCTION OF DRURY’S ARTWORK

11/3/2012

0 Comments

 
Contemplative art might point things out, but it’s not finger-pointing art. It’s not accusatory. It may show us something – and we may learn something about ourselves – but it doesn’t have anyone on its agenda. It doesn’t have an agenda at all, unless it’s simply to bring some good into the world -- though even that might be stating it a little strongly. Its purpose is to be goodness. It is an offering, like the offering of the gift of good food, from the generosity of the heart. It is the gift of contemplation.

This is what I see in Drury’s destroyed artwork, the full title of which is, “Carbon Sink: What Goes Around Comes Around.” I cannot see that he is attacking the fossil fuel industry. There is nothing in it that suggests, for instance, that he doesn’t appreciate all the goodness that these sources of energy have brought to our culture, and he doesn’t point a finger at any particular person or company. In fact the work is (was) very beautiful in its archetypal spiral, and in the age-old wisdom in the title, that what goes around comes around. That would seem hard to argue with, wouldn’t it? So why were some so offended? Why the vitriol of defensive demands for destruction of the art? Do these people have something against the beauty of spirals or the wisdom of the ages? Is this what they are afraid of?

It appears so. Because beauty and wisdom question the use of fossil fuels. Even without the title (though without the title, who would have noticed?), this work stands for all that is being destroyed in the name of industry. And it brings up questions that the fossil fuel tycoons do not want raised.  In an age where over 500 mountain tops have been “removed” (utterly destroyed) in the Appalachian mountains, billions of gallons of crude oil spilled into our oceans, and the continued burning of these fuels is destroying the capacity of the planet itself to feed and clothe and shelter us, it is important to these corporations that this beauty and wisdom not be embraced, these questions not be raised. Once raised the answers are not that difficult to come by. I will say here what Drury does not say in his artwork, that if we do not end our dependence on these fuel sources, and very very soon, it will be the end of life on this planet as we know it.

If we care about any of this, we should be thanking Chris Drury and others who raise these questions, not destroying their work and silencing their voices.


0 Comments

    Author

    I am an artist. I live in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    February 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    May 2013
    March 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    September 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.